Clique Aqui Para ir para a Home

Cimentos

Aux. Restaurativos

Resinas Desensibilizante Fibra de Contenção
Selantes Hidróxido de Cálcio Hemostasia Clareamento DICAS CLINICAS
Adesivos Clique para imprimir esta página    >>>>>          Fale -Conosco

 

The permeability of the sulcular epithelium and its sulcular fluid flow is eliminated by gently rubbing the sulcular tissues with the viscous solution and the plastic infusion device (Figures 21 and 22). The soft padded ends of the plastic infusors are recommended for addressing delicate sulcular epithelium. The sulcus is firmly rinsed and evaluated for dryness (Figure 23). If the sulcular epithelium is partially denuded at the time of bonding, extra precautions are necessary relative to hemostasis. If any acid conditioner contacts the denuded tissues, bleeding may be reinitiated. In these situations, a cord with hemostatic should be placed submarginally or extra care taken with the infusion device. Etchant contact to soft tissues should be minimized. Bonding steps, from acid conditioning (Figure 24) to primer (s) application (Figure 25) and coating with a prebonding  resin, will occur uneventlylly (Figure 26).    

Figure 28. A dual cure high-filled composite luting resin, 
Permalute, is mixed and loaded into a syringe. Resin is
 expressed from the syringe

Figure 26. A prebonding type resin (Permagen Bonding 
Resin without
light curing is used here) is applied 
to wet the preparation surfaces relative to the 
luting composite.  

Figure 27. Primer and prebonding type resins have been 
applied in the absence of sulcular fluids. If not 
controlled, sulcular fluids or blood may 
cause contamination.  

The absence of sulcular fluids following prebonding resin application is evident (Figure 27). The porcelain crown has been appropriately treated for bonding. A quality chemical or dual cure luting resin (eg, Permalute, Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, UT) is mixed and loaded for syringe tip delivery (Figure 28). The crown is seated in place (Figure 29). Note the aesthetic restoration (Figures 30 and 31).  
The evolution of aesthetic techniques is a progression of change from the 3/4 cast restoration on the molar, placed in 1975, followed by a metal-ceramic restoration on the second premolar in 1985, and finally the all-ceramic bonded restoration on the first premolar in 1995. The emphasis on aesthetic dentistry is on the increase, due to the demand by society for better appearance and higher quality of life. Advancements in dental technologies and materials have facilitated our abilities to accommodate these demands.
   

  Figure 29. The all-ceramic crown is seated to place with 
gentle labiolingual rocking motion to express excess
 luting resin.  
Figure 30. Occlusal view ot the all-ceramic restoration 
of the maxillary left tirst premolar (tooth #12).  
Figure 31. Labial view of the definitive restoration of the 
maxillary left first premolar (tooth #12).  

CONCLUSION

Good tissue management prior to impression making and bonding is the foundation essential for all restorations adjacent to the gingiva. “Active” hemostasis and fluid-control, as discussed, are necessary for successful restorative dentistry, whether with dentin bonding or other restorative procedures. The integrity and longevity of the restored tooth and the surrounding soft tissues are maximized.

REFERENCES

1         Nemetz EH, Seibly W. The use of chemical agents in gingival retraction. Gen Dent 1990; MarchlApril: 104- 

   108.

2         Morgano SM, Malone WFP, Gregoire SE, Goldenberg BS. Tissue management with dental impression 

   materials. Am J Dent 1989;2(5):279- 283.

3         Fischer P. Tissue management for making impressions. In: Restorative Techniques for Individual Teeth.     

   New York: Publishing USA, Inc. 1981, Chapter 15:247-265.  

4         Fischer DE. Tissue management: A new solution to an old problem. Gen Dent 1987;35(3):178-182.

5.        Knoderer WR. Avoiding sulcular hemorrhage during anterior restoration. Pract Periodont & Aesthet Dent

   1992;4(2):17-23.  

6.        Woody RD. Review of the pH of hemostatic agents in tissue displacement. I Prosthet Dent 1993;

   70(2):191-192.  

7.        Brannstrom M. Dentin and Pulp in Restorative Dentistry. London: Wolfe Medical Publications, Ltda., 1982.

8.        Johnson G, Brannstrom M. Pain reaction to cold stimulus in teeth with experimental fillings. Acta    

   Odontologica  Scand 1971;29:639-647.  

9.        Goldman M, Laosonthorn P, White RR. Microleakage: Full crowns and the dental pulp. Endodont

   1992;18:473-475.  

10.      Christensen GJ, Christensen R. Astringedent by Ultradent. Clin Res Assoc Newsletter 1979;3(8)2.

   

 
Índice      1 2 3 4 5